<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Frontal Nerdity Doesn&#039;t Like Tintin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tintinology.poosk.com/2009/02/08/full-frontal-nerdity-doesnt-like-tintin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tintinology.poosk.com/2009/02/08/full-frontal-nerdity-doesnt-like-tintin/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=full-frontal-nerdity-doesnt-like-tintin</link>
	<description>Just another Tregenza Consulting Sites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pe-ads</title>
		<link>http://tintinology.poosk.com/2009/02/08/full-frontal-nerdity-doesnt-like-tintin/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Pe-ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tintinmovie.org/?p=1328#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for well-rounded characters. You need them in a good novel. People who have both bad and good in them.
I loved Tintin when I was a kid, because of the funny names, daring deeds, and swashbuckling adventures. It was great. Still is now :-)
Also, Tintin is a &#039;blank&#039; character. He has little background story, unspecific age, and hardly any character traits, excepting heroism. Tintin was my hero. I could put myself in his place, because of his blankness. He became me. That has only happened twice in the 100s of books I&#039;ve read. Once in Tintin, once int eh awesome Arthur trilogy by Kevin Crossley-Holland. I doubt it will happen again soon, if ever.
In short, Tintin is great in the books, though it will be very hard giving him a personality on screen. People don&#039;t want blank characters on screen. It will be interesting to see Jackson&#039;s/Spielberg&#039;s/Bell&#039;s depiction of Tintin. I look forward to the film.

Pe-ads</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for well-rounded characters. You need them in a good novel. People who have both bad and good in them.<br />
I loved Tintin when I was a kid, because of the funny names, daring deeds, and swashbuckling adventures. It was great. Still is now <img src='http://tintinology.poosk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Also, Tintin is a &#8216;blank&#8217; character. He has little background story, unspecific age, and hardly any character traits, excepting heroism. Tintin was my hero. I could put myself in his place, because of his blankness. He became me. That has only happened twice in the 100s of books I&#8217;ve read. Once in Tintin, once int eh awesome Arthur trilogy by Kevin Crossley-Holland. I doubt it will happen again soon, if ever.<br />
In short, Tintin is great in the books, though it will be very hard giving him a personality on screen. People don&#8217;t want blank characters on screen. It will be interesting to see Jackson&#8217;s/Spielberg&#8217;s/Bell&#8217;s depiction of Tintin. I look forward to the film.</p>
<p>Pe-ads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

